The ghost-writing debateTwo pieces of news this week got me thinking about this. First, I read with interest the many comments on
Mark Schaefer's excellent {grow} blog.
(Which is interesting for many reasons, not least of all being the only
one to feature the {} characters - nice branding, Mark).
Mark asked if ghost-blogging was acceptable and sparked off a stream of comments, some of which I will summarise here.
The second stimulus to write on the subject came from
Neville Hobson and Shel Holtz on the FIR podcast, who brought to my attention the shocking story of Reverb PR, who have been exposed for
allegedly employing a bunch of interns to post bogus app ratings on the iPhone Appstore, (aka 'astroturfing') thus dishonestly inflating their client's overall score.
The
point is, in both cases, an online user is pretending to be someone
else. Sometimes it's OK. Sometimes it's not. As a social media
marketer, you need to know, and it depends who you are representing: a
brand, a colleague, or a customer. The rules, in my opinion, are
radically different for each.
Representing the customer
This is the dark side of social media, and one that has been around since the idea of the
Buyersphere
came along (ie a world where buyers could share opinions so freely that
peer-generated content becomes the dominant influence over their buying
behaviour). This is unacceptable and is exactly what Reverb PR are
being slated for. Don't do it.
Representing a colleague
By
representing a colleague, I refer to the ghost-blogging debate. The
idea that a writer should assemble content on behalf of another person
(who is usually prominent enough to warrant a blog, but too time-poor
to write it for themselves). Many social media purists will say that
this should never happen, because online communities are built on
trusting relationships. Maybe this is naive, but it is certainly
something we should strive for.
If we take blogging as the most obvious example, I believe this can work, but with the following provisos, ie:
- if
you write for someone else, your role should be to interpret their
ideas, not your own. This can be achieved with a scheduled 10-minute
chat every week; skilled content producers can work in this way to
create an engaging and genuine stream of original content. The role of
the producer is not to devise the recipe, but to prepare it for
consumption.
- the 'headline' name (can anyone think of a better term?) should always read and review the blog
- he or she should also always respond - or dictate responses - to any comments received
- he
or she should look after 'microblogging' - the immediacy of the medium
makes ghost-twittering a ridiculous idea (as well as a ridiculous word).
Representing a brand
I believe that this is the preferred way forward for B2B marketers who wish to use the social web to their advantage.
Everyone
knows that brands have a defined personality. Everyone also knows that,
on social media platforms, people talk to people, not to brands. So all
that is required is someone with a personality that is appropriate for
the brand in question.
So if, for example, a B2B organisation
wants to create a blog to share their expertise and create a reputation
for being positive, helpful, expert and friendly members of their
online community, there is no reason why a hired hand should not write
the blog.
Usually, you would expect someone who works for the company to do it. But why should a third-party be any different?
The only real difference is in their terms of employment. (And don't forget that full-time employees often move on while the contracted agencies stay in place!)
The
writer would use the information available to them from within the
company, and share this for the benefit of the community. All this
would be under their own name. They become an expert spokesperson for
the brand, responsible for turning the raw expertise of the company
into engaging content for the online community. There is no cover up.
(NB: Please note that normal social media rules apply - we are talking
about a spokesperson for the brand, not the product!)
Find your voice and speak up
Of
course, there is a less desirable fourth option - and that is to do
nothing at all. B2B organisations have so much to gain from social
media that to stand by and allow competitors to outshine them online
would be a tragedy.
Yet if - as is usually the case - you are
simply too busy to get 'this blogging thing' off the ground, consider
who's who on the web. You can never try to represent your customer, you
should only very carefully represent another colleague, but you can and
should represent your brand - at all times.
This is an ongoing
discussion and we are still in the early stages of social media
adoption. But by evolving the debate, I hope I am encouraging B2B
marketers to do the right thing.
Is ghost-writing acceptable? Who writes for your brand? Are you a genuine contributor to the social media web - or a fake? Tell me what you think...
Authenticity is key, and it always looks obvious when a blog supposedly written by the CEO is ghost written (usually by the companies PR dept). They often contain little of any actual value to the reader and seem very sanitised. They often do more harm than good and show the company (I've got a couple in mind...) as more out of touch than if they didn't have a blog in the first place.
If you're going to blog, at least try to give it 100%.
I don't think I'd be able to spot a ghost written blog article, but I've heard about ghost written tweets of celebrities that are too busy to update themselves so they're PR person does it. Blog comments are a different matter though. For the first time, just yesterday, I wrote one on behalf of one of my clients because she is not capable of doing it herself (and I can't be bothered teaching her)
Thanks for your comments guys - interesting that you come from slightly different angles on this one.
I agree with Ross in that a half-hearted blog is often worse than no blog at all. They are interesting because they offer a new insight, a new angle, a new opinion – which is the kind of thing that every company should have the expertise to provide within their niche.
Which brings me to ask Sheldon whether you believe your client is getting real value from your contribution as a writer. I mean no offence. I'm a copywriter by trade myself, but I'm reluctant to promise clients that they can get the full value of social media techniques like blogging/commenting unless they can at least give me some access to their expertise, no matter how raw.
The alternative is to bring you, as a writer, up to the same level of expertise as the client. We can write for them, but we can't do their thinking!
Interesting points, thx so much for contributing to the debate.